Subject 2
The history of architecture, professional ethics and ethics committee.
The history of architecture, professional ethics and ethics committee.
".... Ethics Committee. Architect Council is authorized under the Architects Act 2543. Section 57, served as officers have to decide if the accused person has been licensed practitioner architecture that all the professional ethics of professional architectural offense as they appear in the rules. ....."
A Study of Modern Architecture in Thailand indicates that the start-up the value chain from year Act 2473. After the teacher holds nerve Na car Poe studied architecture from the University of Liverpool, England turned back to teaching and learning about architecture at Poh Chang School, and continuously moving the department in the Faculty of Engineering, Architecture at Chulalongkorn University. Develop into the Faculty of Architecture at the same institution. After the supervision of the architectural profession has occurred at later time, by a group of architects, mostly graduates from foreign countries have jointly established the Association of Siamese Architects in the year 2477, to carry out development activities and supervise the professional practice of architects and continuously expanded by increasing the number of architects. Later, the association has pushed the Architectural Act BE 2508 to regulate the professional practice of architecture in the official sector by the Ministry of Interior. This is the first time in Thailand has laws related to professional practice architecture as a material object.
After that, the government has declared effective the Ministerial Regulation No. 4 (BE 2511) issued under such Act. To define the professional etiquette of professional architectural control as a framework for professional practice in architecture has always been for 23 years until the year Act 2534 when the Ministry of Interior has already announced a new ministerial regulation to cancel the Ministerial Regulation No. 8 (2534). Issued under the above Act to replace. The set of professional etiquette of professional control architecture to include 17 article, by cutting the original content that "No architects, contractors acting" out to meet the profession of social change, which represents a single edit that occurred during that time. Professionals can use all the etiquette of the profession. This is a framework of professional practice to continue. Under the supervision of the Control Board Practice of Architecture (CBPA), Ministry of Interior. Later, when it was founded by the Federation of Architects Act Architects Act 2543 will be architect Council representing all four branches of professional practice regulatory control board to replace the practice of architecture (Animal Science), originally to the architectural profession have the opportunity to supervise the work of people in the same profession freely. From that law. Puts the power of the architect responsible for ethics has become a task under the laws of the Federation of Architects completely. Later, the Federation of Architects, professional etiquette to improve the 17 items above and under the Ministerial Council of Architects announced the regulations on professional ethics architecture of 25 items from the 2545 Census at 12 June 2546 until the present.
Architect Council Ethics Commission is authorized under the Architects Act 2543 Section 57. to be an official act is to decide if the accused person has been licensed practitioner architecture all the professional ethics of professional architecture that offense as they appear in the regulations. This committee members will be appointed in accordance with the resolutions of the General Meeting of the Council of Architects, and serve for a period of a term of three years but not more than two consecutive terms. Consists of a Chairman and Director of the Board of Ethics under the Architects Council but not less than three people. The Board are all experts in the architecture profession. And have more features as they appear in Section 53 of the same Act is as follows.
1) is a professional architectural control for not less than 10 years.
2) have never been punished unethical behavior.
Committee members. Architect Council in the current session (BE 2550-53) consists of the following experts.
1) Mom Luang Pummarirat Chongcharoensuk Chairman of the Board of Directors
2) Mr. Ghee Kanisthanan Committee
3) Mr. Chetkamchon Prommayothi Committee
4) Mr. Supojana Kowitwanich Committee
5) Mr. Somboon Wessunthornthep Committee
6) Mr. Pisit Rochanawanich Committee
7) Ass.Professor Noppadol Suvatchananon Committee
8) Com.Air Chief Mom Luang Prakitti Kasemsan Committee
However, Maj. Gen. Police Kraisorn Sornsri is advisory committee members.
Committee on Ethics Board Architect Council.
Architects Act 2543 Section 58 committee members have the power to appoint a subcommittee to consider Or to perform any of the committee members are replaced, to reduce the time in the process to decide the allegations and investigation. Agenda for the committee members present to appoint a subcommittee to help operate an additional 2 copies of the following.
1. Committee screening of complaints of breaches of professional ethics architectural control.
Committee's. This set has the power under Section 59 of the Architects Act. The official under the Penal Code. Main tasks is the primary screening of alleged ethics committee instead. With the examination and diagnosis allegations and evidence obtained that fall into the wrong code or what not. If you see such evidence. That was not enough to filter the sub-committee will make a request for assistance to the complainant. Or the accused and the public. Ask or private, and/or requested documents about the complaint or allegation or any materials for the purpose of the review.
And the other one. Sub-Committee on the screen. Will issue a written order to the licensed practitioner architecture control that is alleged or alleged breach of professional ethics to testify, and/or documents. After review the various documents until complete. Case without merit or not to sell their unethical. Sub-Committee's decision to propose to the committee members to address the allegations. If you have information to offer on back to the committee members to consider appointing a subcommittee to investigate the matter further through the process of investigation.
List of Screening Committee are as follows.
1) Maj. Gen. Police Kraisorn Sornsri President of Sub Committee
2) Colonel Police Aekpichai Pimonsin Sub Committee
3) Mr. Nitisak Chobdamrongtham Sub Committee
4) General military Kamol Wongsomboon Sub Committee
5) Mr. Chanwit Sirisuntranonta Sub Committee and Secretary
2. Subcommittee investigation.
A sub-committee appointed by the committee members to act as case expressions investigation of alleged cases fall into the wrong ethics. The Committee will have the duty to investigate the parties Sobpoyan audit documents and opinions, as well as the findings of the committee members to render a decision again. Furthermore Investigation committee has not appointed a permanent. The committee members will approve the appointment now and again to that case or the allegations. Session and ending when the probe trial is terminated.
Composition of the subcommittee investigation include Professionals in the field of control architectures with accused and by a qualified professional's license. Not less than the accused an amount not less than 3 persons, but if the same qualifications, then consider the appointment of a senior is the Sub-Committee. The regulations on the license suspension and revocation of professional Architectural Control Act 2544 requires the most senior Member who serves as President of Sub Committee. In addition, the Sub-Committee must also have the additional features are as follows.
1) Licensed professional architectural control for not less than 10 years.
2) have never been punished unethical behavior.
Process hearing for the Board and various sub-sets. Will proceed under the authority and procedures. Architects Act. And regulations with The license suspension and revocation of the license, such as major. However, in the same issue regulations. Also stated that the alleged architect may protest the appointment of any person to sub. If that is the sub-committee of stakeholders. Or the reasons for exasperation with the alleged, the objection must be made in writing to the Chairman of justification against committee members within 15 days after receiving the order from the sub-committee appointed by council architects. However, the right to change or not depends on the Ethics Committee will consider the request a reason or not.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น