Subject 10
Professional ethics of change.
Professional ethics of change.
Cycle of changes in circumstances of social and professional situation, the architecture can occur any time that the development of social, cultural, technological progress and the impact of other factors in many countries, social level. Many of these causes would make the terms relevant to the work of professional architectural review should be modified to focus mainly on the context of change over time. As shown in the past, terms associated with unethical actions of the architects and the profession has evolved to change continuously to the present. For example, to cancel a regulation which prohibits contractors architects etc.
Ethics Committee in the current session (2550-53) decided to amend the Articles of Federation with the ethics of professional architects, architecture, BE 2545. Through the work of the subcommittee to consider rules and regulations relating to the consideration and decision of the committee members by reason of such changes, and then combined with the following main reasons.
1. Some of the existing regulations there is a problem in diagnosis because there is no clear enough. Due to the following reasons.
1) The reference that has not or has not yet promulgated or a reference that can not be measured quantitatively clearly as "professional standards", the standard of professional services " "intention to study and professional practice " and " professional practice at full capacity, etc.
2) the total cases of unethical acts in Article 2 cases using the same "and" link Therefore, if a professional offense to any one. Committee may consider and decide that no crime because the offender only one case of the missing element that the offense was.
2. Some of the regulations is not appropriate and consistent with the current situation, especially the issue of ban advertising of professional architecture entirely in all cases. The challenges are vulnerable to random practice of professional practice, the decision of the Board of Directors and an obstacle to communicate useful information to receive professional services to employers, society and the public.
3. Cancel the share issue and the regulations issued by the Division of revisions to the item under the same sort of guilty by reason of any of ethics or any of that. Would affect both linked to the public, the profession, to employers and to all professional participants in all aspects of direct and indirect, are already in the end.
In addition. The overall approach of trial and guilty of ethics committee members over the decision by the discretion and experience of professional practice according to individual features as they appear in legislation. The ethics committee in the past, present and past it are the experts who trusted in the profession all together. Consequently, the original regulations, while some are content clearly too much detail may be an obstacle to the consideration of the Committee itself to interpretation and decision on only the letters that appear in the rules fairly and build professional practice itself would not be able to take any action because it was quite specific prohibitions and many more then that for any network, are also vulnerable to ignite the offense, or lose all. When in fact, the accused has no intention or offense intended in any way.
Therefore, to improve regulations, this new. Sub-Committee and is of the view that the content rules are revised set of principles is just as guilty. The Committee will have the opportunity to use discretion to decide taking into account the cause, intent and effect of the alleged offender's even more and a result the likelihood of the complaint and the offender's risk of random professionals will likely decrease.
The current draft of new ethics rules is currently being presented to the joint membership of professional associations and four branches (For details, interested parties should draft new regulations at issue. www.act.or.th) for comments and suggestions to improve the last general meeting prior to import. Architect Council consideration and approval in the near term, and after this subcommittee will revise the relevant regulations in the following.
The architectural profession should pay attention, and attention to study the details of new draft regulations, this thorough and offer comments or suggestions for improvement on their own responsibility, if possible for the benefit of themselves and the profession overall and to track the announcement of new regulations and enforcement to understand the details of the contents adjusted to the current data. Through various media, public relations of the Federation of Architects closely and continuously and are cautioned not to their offense under new regulations after the contents of strictly enforcing the following.
(Thank you committee members current session (2550-53), please provide feedback and information to improve the content of this comes at the occasion include.
1) Mom Luang Pummarirat Chongcharoensuk Chairman of the Board of Directors
2) Mr. Supojana Kowitwanich Committee
3) Com.Air Chief Mom Luang Prakitti Kasemsan Committee
Citations.
1. Tanit Kitti-Ampon, Ratchot Chomphunich..20 questions about the ethics Architects, the Association of Siamese Architects under Royal Patronage, Bangkok, 2549.
2. Architect Act, BE 2543.
3. Council regulation on the ethics of architects, Architectural Act 2545, the council architect
4. Architect Council regulation on the license suspension and revocation of professional Architectural Control Act 2544, the Federation of Architects.
5. Mom Luang Pummarirat Chongcharoensuk, Chairman of the committee members interviewed Act 2550-53, on January 6, 2552.
5) Mr. Supojana Kowitwanich, Ethics Committee interviewed architects Council Act 2550-53, the same day.
6) Com.Air Chief Mom Luang Prakitti Kasemsan, Ethics Committee interviewed architects Council Act 2550-53, the same day.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น